Optimising interruptive clinical decision support alerts for antithrombotic duplicate prescribing in hospital.

INTRODUCTION: Duplicate prescribing clinical decision support alerts can prevent important prescribing errors but are frequently the cause of much alert fatigue. Stat dose prescriptions are a known reason for overriding these alerts. This study aimed to evaluate the effect of excluding stat dose prescriptions from duplicate prescribing alerts for antithrombotic medicines on alert burden, prescriber adherence, and prescribing. MATERIALS AND METHODS: A before (January 1st, 2017 to August 31st, 2022) and after (October 5th, 2022 to September 30th, 2023) study was undertaken of antithrombotic duplicate prescribing alerts and prescribing following a change in alert settings. Alert and prescribing data for antithrombotic medicines were joined, processed, and analysed to compare alert rates, adherence, and prescribing. Alert burden was assessed as alerts per 100 prescriptions. Adherence was measured at the point of the alert as whether the prescriber accepted the alert and following the alert as whether a relevant prescription was ceased within an hour. Co-prescribing of antithrombotic stat dose prescriptions was assessed pre- and post-alert reconfiguration. RESULTS: Reconfiguration of the alerts reduced the alert rate by 29 % (p < 0.001). The proportion of alerts associated with cessation of antithrombotic duplication significantly increased (32.8 % to 44.5 %, p < 0.001). Adherence at the point of the alert increased 1.2 % (4.8 % to 6.0 %, p = 0.012) and 11.5 % (29.4 % to 40.9 %, p < 0.001) within one hour of the alert. When ceased after the alert over 80 % of duplicate prescriptions were ceased within 2 min of overriding. Antithrombotic stat dose co-prescribing was unchanged for 4 out of 5 antithrombotic duplication alert rules. CONCLUSION: By reconfiguring our antithrombotic duplicate prescribing alerts, we reduced alert burden and increased alert adherence. Many prescribers ceased duplicate prescribing within 2 min of alert override highlighting the importance of incorporating post-alert measures in accurately determining prescriber alert adherence.

Clinical decision support in a hospital electronic prescribing system informed by local data: experience at a tertiary New Zealand centre.

BACKGROUND: An electronic prescribing and administration (ePA) system has been progressively rolled out to Canterbury District Health Board (CDHB, Christchurch, New Zealand) public hospitals since 2014, and is currently used for around 1300 tertiary beds. ePA data can be used to monitor user behaviour, and to evaluate and inform the local customisation of clinical decision support (CDS) tools within the ePA system. AIMS: To describe retrospectively illustrative vignettes of CDHB ePA analyses that have been used for CDS. METHODS: Alerts were developed according to a set of common principles agreed upon by the CDHB CDS Working Group. Alerts were informed and evaluated by extracting and parsing data for various time periods during 2016 to 2018 from the CDHB ePA database. RESULTS: There was a median of 74 000 prescriptions a month. After examining 525 spironolactone prescriptions, the high dose alert threshold was set at 100 mg with an expected alert burden of 3%. The presence of a ceftriaxone shortage prescribing alert for 1 week was associated with a prescribing rate that was lower than 95% of the preceding 52 weeks. Following review of 367 fentanyl patch alerts, revision of the alert led to false positives falling from 43% to 3% (P < 0.0001). At the point of firing, 6% of antithrombotic drug interactions alerts led to immediate changes in prescriptions (94% overridden), and a further 22% were changed within 30 min after the alert. CONCLUSIONS: Local data extracts from ePA systems can inform iterative configuration of the software and monitor user behaviour.